Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Siem Woldeab vs Max Basing Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Woldeab vs Basing analysis and find out who is favored!
Siem Woldeab vs Max Basing Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Woldeab 1 - 0 Basing
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Woldeab has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Basing has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Woldeab, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Basing has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Woldeab has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Basing has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Woldeab has won 77.78% of matches played (W/L 7/ 2), with Basing winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Woldeab has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 18/ 11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Basing has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Woldeab has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.78% of matches (W/L 7/ 2), where as Basing has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Woldeab winning 1 times and Basing being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Woldeab winning 2 and Basing winning 0. The last match between Woldeab and Basing was at the M15 San Diego, 15-06-2022, First, Hard with Siem Woldeab getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Woldeab and Basing have played a deciding set 0 times, with Woldeab winning 0 times and Basing 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Woldeab winning 0, and Basing 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Woldeab has played against opponents with an average rank of 345.11 while Basing has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Woldeab has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Basing has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Woldeab has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Basing has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
873
Rank
765
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
59% (19-13)
Career Total W/L
57% (28-21)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Siem Woldeab vs Max Basing For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Woldeab VS Basing
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Siem Woldeab | Max Basing |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:0 | 1:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (30/48) | 63% (37/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (23/30) | 49% (18/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (10/18) | 50% (11/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (30/59) | 31% (15/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Siem Woldeab
Player
Max Basing
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Siem Woldeab | Max Basing |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Siem Woldeab Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Pierre Yves Bailly
Player
Siem Woldeab
68%
(
79 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
47 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Siem Woldeab
Player
Learner Tien
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Siem Woldeab
Player
Duarte Vale
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
75 of
123)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
50 of
75)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
123)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Siem Woldeab
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 4-6 12-10 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Siem Woldeab
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Siem Woldeab
Player
Zsombor Velcz
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Siem Woldeab
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Siem Woldeab
Player
Warren Wood
69%
(
72 of
105)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
81%
(
58 of
72)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
36 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Max Basing Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Max Basing
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Basing
Player
Adria Soriano Barrera
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Basing
Player
Filip Peliwo
77%
(
65 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Basing
Player
Sean Hodkin
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Max Basing
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Basing
Player
Eero Vasa
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Basing
Player
Johannes Haerteis
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Max Basing
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Basing
Player
Finn Bass
85%
(
87 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
34 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Basing
Player
Lucas Catarina
76%
(
96 of
127)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
3
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
2
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
52 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Woldeab Vs Basing Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Woldeab are available here and Basing photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
